The articles received are submitted, at first, to the Editorial Board´s review to analyze if they fulfill with the Journal´s submission requirements*. If so, the manuscript will be submitted to consideration of two experts in the subject referred to in the article. Peer review will be under a double-blind revision, in order to keep the anonymity of authors and reviewers. The articles will be evaluated for coherence, clarity, scientific rigor, and practical and/or knowledge contributions; according to formats provided for this purpose by the Journal (see formats: http://revistas.ces.edu.co/index.php/psicologia). According to reviewers’ recommendations, the Editorial Board decides if the article continues or not in the process. In case of being accepted, the respective suggestions will be sent to the authors, with the purpose that the article will be adjusted to the journal´s requirements. It is liability of the authors to address all suggestions and recommendations made by the advisors, and if they disagree, they must support their decision stating reasons; otherwise, the Editorial Board will reserve the right of decision on keeping the article in the revision and consideration process for a future publication. Finally, the Editorial Board will validate the adjustments made to the articles, and consequently, approve its publication.
*Criteria for supporting the evaluation of the works are:
○ Contribution of new theoretical and practical knowledge referred to the submitted subject.
○ Rigor to expose the subject
○ Consideration and clarity of ethical aspects
○ Current affairs and convenience of references according to content
○ Clear and coherent exposition
○ Correct grammatical composition and spelling
○ Carrying out all editorial policies of the Journal.
The Journal will acknowledge receipt of the manuscript through electronic mail or a letter to the author in charge of mail and will report on the result of the initial evaluation in a maximum term of two months. The final acceptance will depend on suggestions or modifications of the work that the advisors of the Committee propose to the author or authors.
With the purpose of guarantying that peer evaluation is blind, verify the compliance of instructions at the time of sending your article through the system OJS (in the option “Assure a blind evaluation”).